➀ A comparison between Huawei's and UCSB's silicon-based epitaxial quantum dot lasers is discussed; ➁ The reliability of quantum dot lasers is higher than that of quantum well lasers under the same technical conditions; ➂ The reliability of quantum dot lasers on GaAs substrates is lower due to lattice mismatch and immature growth technology; ➃ The differences in epitaxial growth technology between Huawei and UCSB are highlighted; ➄ The quality of crystal interfaces and defect densities are compared.
Related Articles
- ECOC2024: Huawei's Application of APD in Lidarabout 1 year ago
- ECOC2024: Huawei's Quantum Dot Laserabout 1 year ago
- 20% growth for private wireless this year; none for public wireless7 days ago
- China's Ominous Leap in Semiconductor Production8 days ago
- China releases 'UBIOS' standard to replace UEFI — Huawei-backed BIOS firmware replacement charges China's domestic computing goals11 days ago
- H1 telecom equipment revenues up 4%21 days ago
- China bans research company that helped unearth Huawei's use of TSMC tech despite U.S. bans — TechInsights added to Unreliable Entity List by state authorities24 days ago
- Zscaler: Why I'm Doubling Down Now29 days ago
- $37 billion 'Stargate of China' project takes shape — country is converting farmland into data centers to centralize AI compute powerabout 1 month ago
- Huawei unveils Atlas 950 SuperCluster — promises 1 ZettaFLOPS FP4 performance and features hundreds of thousands of 950DT APUsabout 1 month ago