➀ A comparison between Huawei's and UCSB's silicon-based epitaxial quantum dot lasers is discussed; ➁ The reliability of quantum dot lasers is higher than that of quantum well lasers under the same technical conditions; ➂ The reliability of quantum dot lasers on GaAs substrates is lower due to lattice mismatch and immature growth technology; ➃ The differences in epitaxial growth technology between Huawei and UCSB are highlighted; ➄ The quality of crystal interfaces and defect densities are compared.
Related Articles
- ECOC2024: Huawei's Application of APD in Lidar11 months ago
- ECOC2024: Huawei's Quantum Dot Laser11 months ago
- Huawei's brute force AI tactic seems to be working — CloudMatrix 384 claimed to outperform Nvidia processors running DeepSeek R13 months ago
- U.S. ban on EDA software hits Chinese tech companies hard — Xiaomi, Lenovo among affected3 months ago
- Carlyle Secured Lending: NAV Continues To Slide Due To Weak Earnings3 months ago
- 2025 smartphone market to grow 0.6% y-o-y3 months ago
- Q1 high end router market shows first growth since Q2 20233 months ago
- Q1 Mobile Core Market Up 32% YoY3 months ago
- Clipping Nvidia’s Wings4 months ago
- U.S. issues worldwide crackdown on using Huawei Ascend chips, says it violates export controls4 months ago