1. An 8%+ yield may initially seem attractive, but fundamental flaws emerge upon reviewing the fund's financial statements and distribution history. 2. Management has incurred losses on options writing, and return-of-capital distributions and a negative CAGR indicate subpar portfolio management practices. 3. BST has underperformed in terms of capital appreciation compared to other tech-focused ETFs like QQQM. Better alternatives exist, such as STK.
Related Articles
- USA: Better Alternatives Available (Downgrade)10 months ago
 - Ares Capital's Q3: Important Implications For BDCs5 days ago
 - Energy Dividend Stocks: I Like Kinder Morgan, But Love Enterprise Products Partners18 days ago
 - AT&T Stock: Is This Free Cash Flow Machine A Buy On The Dip?27 days ago
 - Nebius: Overvaluation Miss Becomes A Win (Rating Upgrade)about 1 month ago
 - Petrobras: Oil Giant With Exceptional Margins Worth The Political Riskabout 2 months ago
 - 11 Ways To Profit From Nvidia, Regardless Of What Happens From Here2 months ago
 - YMAX's 66% Yield: The Dark Side Of Its Weekly Payouts2 months ago
 - Bank of Montreal: Tallying The Scorecard4 months ago
 - Quantitative Comparison Makes Coca-Cola A Top Pick For Long-Term Investors5 months ago