1. An 8%+ yield may initially seem attractive, but fundamental flaws emerge upon reviewing the fund's financial statements and distribution history. 2. Management has incurred losses on options writing, and return-of-capital distributions and a negative CAGR indicate subpar portfolio management practices. 3. BST has underperformed in terms of capital appreciation compared to other tech-focused ETFs like QQQM. Better alternatives exist, such as STK.
Related Articles
- USA: Better Alternatives Available (Downgrade)8 months ago
- Quantitative Comparison Makes Coca-Cola A Top Pick For Long-Term Investors3 months ago
- High-Quality Dividend Growth Stocks Near 52-Week Lows: Alphabet Is Astounding4 months ago
- Correction Alert: Popular Dividend Growth Stocks Due For A Sharp Pullback4 months ago
- Amazon: Despite Bull Hype, Stock Price Same As 4 Years Ago5 months ago
- Microsoft: A Brilliant Business, But Here's Why It's Not In My Portfolio5 months ago
- VICI Properties: Investors Are Misunderstanding The Earnings Report5 months ago
- Amazon: Great Buy Following Its 4th Largest Selloff In 10 Years6 months ago
- Nvidia Sellers Have Clearly Outnumbered Buyers Since July: My Price Targets6 months ago
- Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week Of March 166 months ago