1. An 8%+ yield may initially seem attractive, but fundamental flaws emerge upon reviewing the fund's financial statements and distribution history. 2. Management has incurred losses on options writing, and return-of-capital distributions and a negative CAGR indicate subpar portfolio management practices. 3. BST has underperformed in terms of capital appreciation compared to other tech-focused ETFs like QQQM. Better alternatives exist, such as STK.
Related Articles
- USA: Better Alternatives Available (Downgrade)5 months ago
- VICI Properties: Investors Are Misunderstanding The Earnings Report2 months ago
- Amazon: Great Buy Following Its 4th Largest Selloff In 10 Years2 months ago
- Nvidia Sellers Have Clearly Outnumbered Buyers Since July: My Price Targets3 months ago
- Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week Of March 163 months ago
- Palantir's Road To Q1, Assessing The Risk/Reward After A Sharp Correction3 months ago
- ASML: Why It's Too Early To Buy3 months ago
- Nvidia: Enough Pain Already3 months ago
- Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week Of March 93 months ago
- Broadcom Q1 Earnings: AI Boom, Why I'm Bullish Again3 months ago