1. The article discusses the assumption that more data leads to better decisions in generative AI, contrasting it with human decision-making processes. 2. It argues that AI lacks real-world knowledge and emotional intelligence, which are crucial for effective decision-making. 3. The author questions the sources of truth used in AI training and suggests that without significant customer adoption or a killer app, AI development may come to a halt.
Related Articles
- Upcoming Webinar: Accelerating Semiconductor Design with Generative AI and High-Level Abstraction2 months ago
- 14 AI Infra Experts Gather at GenAICon 2025 Beijing, Discussing the Future of AI2 months ago
- Apple fumbles AI again: new 'LLM Siri' update for iOS 19 delayed, now expected with iOS in 20263 months ago
- Trumped3 months ago
- Activision admits GenAI tools already in use for Call of Duty development3 months ago
- Xbox's new Muse generative AI may be compatible with user-created mods3 months ago
- How Synopsys Enables Gen AI on the Edge3 months ago
- CEO Interview with Dr. William Wang of Alpha Design AI3 months ago
- Will DeepSeek Impact Wafer Demand?3 months ago
- Sam Altman backpedals on release of o3, shortly after de-hyping 'superintelligence' claims4 months ago