<p>➀ The article reveals the internal details of the failure of Intel's Itanium processor;</p><p>➁ It discusses how Intel's insistence on releasing x64 versions of Itanium CPUs could have led to victory in the x86-64 domain over AMD;</p><p>➂ The article highlights the importance of backward compatibility in the PC market and how Itanium's pure 64-bit architecture hindered its market performance;</p><p>➃ It describes the role of former Intel Chief x86 Architect, Robert Colwell, in the development of the Pentium 4 CPU and the challenges he faced with Intel's management.</p>
Related Articles
- Anirudh Fireside Chats with Jensen and Lip-Bu at CadenceLIVE 20255 days ago
- Design-Technology Co-Optimization (DTCO) Accelerates Market Readiness of Angstrom-Scale Process Technologies12 days ago
- Micron confirms memory price hikes as AI and data center demand surges2 months ago
- Jiang Shangyi: Intel is Now a 'Minor Player', Should Merge with Established Chip Technology Companies2 months ago
- Can Earthquake in Myanmar disrupt PC hardware production? Manufacturers are checking out2 months ago
- Semiconductor CapEx Down in 2024 up in 20252 months ago
- STH Q1 2025 Letter from the Editor Re-calibration and Expansion2 months ago
- ‘high-end’ Intel Battlemage GPU was reportedly cancelled in late 20242 months ago
- Intel Allegedly Scraps High-End Battlemage GPU, GeForce Alone At The Top2 months ago
- Crucial Pro Overclocking DDR5-6400 C38 2x16GB Review: Deceitfully Fast2 months ago