<p>➀ The article reveals the internal details of the failure of Intel's Itanium processor;</p><p>➁ It discusses how Intel's insistence on releasing x64 versions of Itanium CPUs could have led to victory in the x86-64 domain over AMD;</p><p>➂ The article highlights the importance of backward compatibility in the PC market and how Itanium's pure 64-bit architecture hindered its market performance;</p><p>➃ It describes the role of former Intel Chief x86 Architect, Robert Colwell, in the development of the Pentium 4 CPU and the challenges he faced with Intel's management.</p>
Related Articles
- Intel Reportedly Eyes Retired TSMC Veteran Wei-Jen Lo to Lead R&D5 days ago
- Intel Reaffirms 14A, Deepens Nvidia Alliance9 days ago
- Intel's pivotal 18A process is making steady progress, but still lags behind — yields only set to reach industry standard levels in 202710 days ago
- Intel posts return to growth and profitability in Q3 2025, but significant challenges remain — achieves $13.7 billion revenue with $4.1 billion operating profit10 days ago
- Trump administration to follow up Intel stake with investment in quantum computing, report claims — tens of millions of CHIPS Act dollars could be paid out to leading companies in exchange for equity11 days ago
- Trump says Intel has made a 'fortune' and America has made $40 billion after the US invested in ailing chipmaker — Intel has gained $73 billion in market cap since investment13 days ago
- TSMC to break ground on 1.4nm fab on Nov 5th13 days ago
- ULTA Beauty: The International Expansion Plan Is Taking Shape24 days ago
- How the Father of FinFETs Helped Save Moore’s Law27 days ago
- Steam Survey Gaming Trends: AMD Chips Away At Intel & Windows 11 Dominatesabout 1 month ago